»Intelligence starts with improvisation.«

Yona Friedman

Blog Interview

Amongst the Ruins of the Russian Avant-Garde

Isa Willinger on her film: “Away from All Suns!”

  • The roof of the Narkomfin Building, in its decayed state. Film still. (All stills courtesy Isa Willinger and Kloos & Co. Medien) 1 / 16  The roof of the Narkomfin Building, in its decayed state. Film still. (All stills courtesy Isa Willinger and Kloos & Co. Medien)
  • “Away from All Suns!” director Isa Willinger. (Photo courtesy: Isa Willinger) 2 / 16  “Away from All Suns!” director Isa Willinger. (Photo courtesy: Isa Willinger)
  • Archival newsreel footage of a Soviet parade, with a wooden model of Vladimir Tatlin’s Monument to the Third International (1919-20) carried through the streets. Film still. 3 / 16  Archival newsreel footage of a Soviet parade, with a wooden model of Vladimir Tatlin’s Monument to the Third International (1919-20) carried through the streets. Film still.
  • The iconic triangular staircase at the Communal Student House of the Textile Institute (1929), designed by Ivan Nikolaev. Today, the building is being restored by the architect Vsevolod Kulish, one of the film’s three protagonists. Film still.&am 4 / 16  The iconic triangular staircase at the Communal Student House of the Textile Institute (1929), designed by Ivan Nikolaev. Today, the building is being restored by the architect Vsevolod Kulish, one of the film’s three protagonists. Film still.&am
  • A cat prowls along the Narkomfin Building’s famous ribbon strip windows. Film still. 5 / 16  A cat prowls along the Narkomfin Building’s famous ribbon strip windows. Film still.
  • The artist Donatas assembling a stage in his apartment at the Narkomfin Building (1928-30), designed by Moisei Ginzburg and probably the most iconic Constructivist building. Film still. 6 / 16  The artist Donatas assembling a stage in his apartment at the Narkomfin Building (1928-30), designed by Moisei Ginzburg and probably the most iconic Constructivist building. Film still.
  • Donatas directing an art performance put on by his collaborators, inside the Narkomfin Building. Film still. 7 / 16  Donatas directing an art performance put on by his collaborators, inside the Narkomfin Building. Film still.
  • Art performance underway in the Narkomfin Building. Film still. 8 / 16  Art performance underway in the Narkomfin Building. Film still.
  • Inspecting the decaying remains of a fleet of Soviet jets. Film still. 9 / 16  Inspecting the decaying remains of a fleet of Soviet jets. Film still.
  • The Dynamo Stadium (1928), seen here in 2012 being demolished: the fate hanging over many of Moscow’s surviving Constructivist buildings, their existence threatened by new real estate developments. Film still. 10 / 16  The Dynamo Stadium (1928), seen here in 2012 being demolished: the fate hanging over many of Moscow’s surviving Constructivist buildings, their existence threatened by new real estate developments. Film still.
  • Dormitory building of the agricultural academy K.A. Timirjazeva, designed by Boris Iofan. Film still. 11 / 16  Dormitory building of the agricultural academy K.A. Timirjazeva, designed by Boris Iofan. Film still.
  • Detail of dormitory building of the agricultural academy K.A. Timirjazeva, designed by Boris Iofan. Film still. 12 / 16  Detail of dormitory building of the agricultural academy K.A. Timirjazeva, designed by Boris Iofan. Film still.
  • Trechgornaya Manufactura Building. Film still. 13 / 16  Trechgornaya Manufactura Building. Film still.
  • The Likhachev Palace of Culture (1933-37), seen here in its present state, was designed by the Vesnin brothers, who helped found the Constructivist movement. Film still. 14 / 16  The Likhachev Palace of Culture (1933-37), seen here in its present state, was designed by the Vesnin brothers, who helped found the Constructivist movement. Film still.
  • The Melnikov House glimpsed through its garden. Film still. 15 / 16  The Melnikov House glimpsed through its garden. Film still.
  • Film poster for “Away from All Suns!” Courtesy Kloos & Co. Medien 16 / 16  Film poster for “Away from All Suns!” Courtesy Kloos & Co. Medien


Architecture was once considered fundamental to the rethinking of society and the shape it took. This is the premise of Away from All Suns! a new feature-length documentary by filmmaker Isabella Willinger, a documentary filmmaker based in Munich and Berlin, whose work focuses on gender, social upheavals and human rights. Her film examines the relics of Constructivist architecture scattered throughout Moscow and attempts to tease out what’s left of their revolutionary past. Upon their construction, these buildings embodied the emancipatory change promised and, at least for a time, instituted by the Bolshevik Revolution. Over three-quarters of a century later, suspended in a fragile purgatory between decay and demolition, structures like the Narkomfin Building (1928-30) and the Communal Student House of the Textile Institute (1929) still stun in their radical and emphatic newness.

These buildings seem to rise “from a time more modern than my own,” Willinger says at the beginning of the film. And yet they are just one part of the story. The film’s narrative juggles a cast of unconnected characters, each of whom occupies – in one sense or another – three revolutionary residences. As becomes apparent over the course of the film, their paths are intrinsically bound up with the misfortunes of their storied addresses; like the buildings themselves, they are imperiled by increasingly conservative, reactionary forces that, buoyed by a galvanized corporate sector, threaten their existence, if not that of democratic Russian society. Even so, they persist against great odds, with mixed feelings of nostalgia, hope, and helplessness.

Willinger recently premiered Away from All Suns! at the Istanbul Architecture Film Festival, where it was awarded the top prize. Ahead of its European DVD release, she talks to Sammy Medina for uncube about her film, the Soviet avant-garde, and the bleak future of Russian architecture.

“Away from All Suns!” director Isa Willinger. (Photo courtesy: Isa Willinger)

When did you first visit the modernist ruins in Moscow?

I first visited them in the summer of 2010. I was actually researching a completely different film topic in Moscow then and was not planning on making a film about them at all. On my walks through the city, I felt an affinity to the Constructivist buildings that I would come by randomly and began to photograph them. Moscow as an urban space and also as a cultural space has something very inaccessible about itself, something even unwelcoming and closed. In retrospect, I think the buildings were the only thing in Moscow’s city landscape I could visually and culturally connect with.

What was it about them that impressed you?

To me the buildings seemed like gigantic signs in the city. I have no background in architecture, so initially I wasn’t aware of the spatial and urban concepts behind them. In the course of making the film, this obviously changed, but I have never lost the sense of my initial impression. I’ve always continued to see and treat them as signs, rather than architecture.

And what are they signaling?

They speak of a time that was filled with hope and with dreams of a better future. In contrast to the popular Groysian interpretation of the avant-garde as the forerunner of the Stalinist totalitarian regime, I really feel a grand humanness in the Constructivist buildings. Whereas, according to the Stalinist paradigm, there was only one masterplan by which everybody had to create art and architecture, among the Constructivists in the 1920s, there were very many different approaches and ideas of how the “new human” should live. In this “should live,” there certainly is a streak of elitism involved – artists were designing the lives of the working class – but the buildings’ vibrant, experimental and humanistic spirit to me is much stronger.

A cat prowls along the Narkomfin Building’s famous ribbon strip windows. Film still.

Your film tells the story of three buildings of the Soviet avant-garde: the Communal Student House of the Textile Institute (1929), the Printing Plant Ogoniok & Apartment House Zhurgaz (1930-35), and the Narkomfin Building (1928-30). Why did you choose these three buildings over other well-known works from the period, such as the Melnikov House or the Rusakov Workers Club?

The film portrays the relationship between the buildings and the people who inhabit them. But the choice was made according to dramaturgic and practical principles. I had to find inhabitants who would make good protagonists for a film, people who’d make it possible to tell a story – and a story means conflict and development. I would have loved to include the Melnikov House, but it was very difficult to get access to and it proved to be impossible to work with Melnikov’s granddaughter who inhabits the house. The Rusakov Workers Club hosts a theater company today. The management there didn’t allow me to work with the person in the company that I had initially found interesting for the film.

What parallels and discontinuities do you see – architecturally, culturally, or otherwise – between 1920s Moscow and today? And how are these observations depicted in the film?

If the 1920s was a period of visionary projects and hope, then today Moscow drowns in stagnation. Putin has installed a neo-tsarist regime. When a wave of protests was building up in 2011 and early 2012 after election fraud, there was hope of possible change in the air in Moscow and St. Petersburg. This wave has receded, however, and frustration has taken its place. But history will move forward.

Archival newsreel footage of a Soviet parade, with a wooden model of Vladimir Tatlin’s Monument to the Third International (1919-20) carried through the streets. Film still.

Architecturally, there’s hardly anything interesting being built, let alone idealistic. But even in mediocre contemporary Russian architecture one can sometimes spot the influence of the Constructivist proportions and use of forms – just by surviving, these buildings continue to secretly leave their mark on the city, even in the design vocabulary of mediocre architects.

What is the state of Constructivist architecture in Moscow today? If the question can be asked, what can contemporary architecture learn from these buildings?

The state of Constructivist architecture is somber. There are some grassroots organizations in Russia that are trying to raise the awareness of the importance of those buildings for Russia’s cultural history. But compared to the power of the financial interest of real estate developers and investors, they can only do very little. It’s nice that there seems to be a growing interest in the buildings among young people, though, which may signal a possible future cultural shift.

What I personally like about the Constructivist buildings is the use of organic materials, like wood, which is in tension with the strict geometric shapes. It softens them and gives them organic warmth. The huge windows admit lots of light and air, creating a pleasant living space. I also think that including communal areas in a building, like a collective sunroof, could help us today to strengthen contemporary society. Services such as built-in day care and kindergartens – as at the Narkomfin – are also extremely progressive and very much ahead of us today.

Art performance underway in the Narkomfin Building. Film still.

How has the film been received in Russia?

The film has been received with great interest in Russia, although I also noticed some reluctance regarding my positive interpretation of the utopian socialist culture of the 1920s. In Russia, people tend to dislike anything connected to communism. The film, however, had an overwhelmingly positive reception in Istanbul, where there is currently a very active protest movement, Consequently, they may be able to appreciate the utopian impetus of these buildings more.

Are you working on any new projects?

I would like to make another film connected to Constructivism and am in the beginning stages of planning another. It will focus on the photographer Richard Pare, specifically his work on surviving Constructivist buildings today. But we are only in the process of finding financing for it.

– Sammy Medina is a writer and architecture critic based in New York.


Away from All Suns!

Documentary, Germany 2013 (ca. 79 min./55 min.)
Director: Isa Willinger
Production: Kloos & Co. Medien
World Sales: Rise and Shine

The film will be screened in LA and Chicago in April as part of their Architecture and Design Film Festivals.

  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Advertisement

RECENT POSTS

more

Recent Magazines

25 Apr 2016

Magazine No. 43
Athens

  • essay

    From the Bottom and the Top

    Powering Athens through collectivity and informal initiatives by Cristina Ampatzidou

  • photo essay

    Nowhere Now Here

    A photo essay by Yiorgis Yerolymbos

  • Essay

    Back to the Garden

    Athens and opportunities for new urban strategies by Aristide Antonas

  • Interview

    Point Supreme

    An interview by Ellie Stathaki

>

03 Mar 2016

Magazine No. 42
Walk the Line

  • Essay

    The Line Connects

    An essay on drawing and architectural education by Wes Jones

  • Essay

    Drawing Attention

    Phineas Harper sketches out new narrative paths with pencil power

  • Essay

    Gotham

    Elvia Wilk on a city of shadows as architectural fiction

  • Interview

    The (Not So) Fine Line

    A conversation thread between Sophie Lovell and architecture cartoonist Klaus

>

28 Jan 2016

Magazine No. 41
Zvi Hecker

  • essay

    Space Packers

    Zvi Hecker’s career-defining partnership with Eldar Sharon and Alfred Neumann by Rafi Segal

  • Interview

    Essentially I am a Medieval Architect

    An interview with Zvi Hecker by Vladimir Belogolovsky

  • viewpoint

    The Technion Affair

    Breaking and entering in the name of architectural integrity by Zvi Hecker

  • Photo Essay

    Revisiting Yesterday’s Future

    A photo essay by Gili Merin

>

17 Dec 2015

Magazine No. 40
Iceland

  • Viewpoint

    Wish You Were Here

    Arna Mathiesen asks: Refinancing Iceland with tourism – but at what cost?

  • Photo Essay

    Spaces Create Bodies, Bodies Create Space

    An essay by Ólafur Elíasson

  • Focus

    Icelandic Domestic

    Focus on post-independence houses by George Kafka

  • Essay

    The Harp That Sang

    The saga of Reykjavík's Concert Hall by Sophie Lovell & Fiona Shipwright

>

more

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MAILING LIST Close

Uncube is brandnew and wants to look good.
For best performance please update your browser.
Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer 10 (or higher), Safari, Chrome, Opera

×