»Architectural interpretations accepted without reflection could obscure the search for signs of a true nature and a higher order.«

Louis Isadore Kahn

Blog Agenda

The Unfettered Gaze

The Radical Lost World of the Brothers Rasch

  • Heinz (left) and Bodo (right) Rasch at the Tagblatt Tower in Stuttgart, 1927. (Photo © Heinz Rasch estate, Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 1 / 23  Heinz (left) and Bodo (right) Rasch at the Tagblatt Tower in Stuttgart, 1927. (Photo © Heinz Rasch estate, Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • Project for Suspended Housing Units, cut-away axonometric view, 1927. Pencil, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal) 2 / 23  Project for Suspended Housing Units, cut-away axonometric view, 1927. Pencil, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal)
  • Suspended House Settlement, perspective view, 1927/28. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch, photo: Hans Schröder) 3 / 23  Suspended House Settlement, perspective view, 1927/28. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch, photo: Hans Schröder)
  • Project for Suspended Housing Units, cut-away axonometric view, 1927. Pen, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal) 4 / 23  Project for Suspended Housing Units, cut-away axonometric view, 1927. Pen, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal)
  • House on the Hill, 1927. Ink, pencil on tracing paper. (Attributed to Heinz Rasch © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 5 / 23  House on the Hill, 1927. Ink, pencil on tracing paper. (Attributed to Heinz Rasch © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • Brothers Rasch: The Ernst Rasch House, Bad Oeynhausen, 1926/27. (© Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 6 / 23  Brothers Rasch: The Ernst Rasch House, Bad Oeynhausen, 1926/27. (© Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • The Ernst Rasch House, 1926/1927. Ink on tracing paper. (Drawing attributed to Heinz Rasch © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 7 / 23  The Ernst Rasch House, 1926/1927. Ink on tracing paper. (Drawing attributed to Heinz Rasch © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • The Brothers Rasch: “Apartment for a Bachelor” in the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe House, Weissenhof Estate, Stuttgart, 1927. (© Archiv Marzona) 8 / 23  The Brothers Rasch: “Apartment for a Bachelor” in the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe House, Weissenhof Estate, Stuttgart, 1927. (© Archiv Marzona)
  • Design layout for an apartment in the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe House, Weissenhof Estate, Stuttgart, 1927. Ink on tracing paper. (Drawing attributed to Heinz Rasch © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 9 / 23  Design layout for an apartment in the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe House, Weissenhof Estate, Stuttgart, 1927. Ink on tracing paper. (Drawing attributed to Heinz Rasch © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • Suspended Housing Units: perspective view along a suspended walkway, 1927/28. Graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal) 10 / 23  Suspended Housing Units: perspective view along a suspended walkway, 1927/28. Graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal)
  • Brothers Rasch: Suspended Housing Units, perspective sketch, 1927/1928. Pencil on parchment paper. (Gift of Jo Carole and Ronald S. Lauder and the Architecture & Design Purchase Fund © Museum of Modern Art New York) 11 / 23  Brothers Rasch: Suspended Housing Units, perspective sketch, 1927/1928. Pencil on parchment paper. (Gift of Jo Carole and Ronald S. Lauder and the Architecture & Design Purchase Fund © Museum of Modern Art New York)
  • Project for a stadium: perspective, 1927/1928. Pencil, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal) 12 / 23  Project for a stadium: perspective, 1927/1928. Pencil, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (Attributed to Bodo Rasch © Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal)
  • Bodo Rasch: Project for a stadium, bird’s eye view, 1927/1928. Pencil, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (© Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal) 13 / 23  Bodo Rasch: Project for a stadium, bird’s eye view, 1927/1928. Pencil, ink and graphite on tracing paper. (© Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal)
  • Bodo Rasch: Design for a Town with Suspended Housing, axonometric view, 1927/28. Pencil, ink, graphite and white gouache on tracing paper. (© Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal) 14 / 23  Bodo Rasch: Design for a Town with Suspended Housing, axonometric view, 1927/28. Pencil, ink, graphite and white gouache on tracing paper. (© Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal)
  • Heinz Rasch: Study for an Office Building, undated. Pencil on tracing paper. (© Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 15 / 23  Heinz Rasch: Study for an Office Building, undated. Pencil on tracing paper. (© Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • Heinz Rasch: Framed sketches with studies for chairs, various years. Pencil and ink on paper. (© Kragstuhlmuseum / Tecta-Archiv, Lauenförde, Photo: Hans Schröder) 16 / 23  Heinz Rasch: Framed sketches with studies for chairs, various years. Pencil and ink on paper. (© Kragstuhlmuseum / Tecta-Archiv, Lauenförde, Photo: Hans Schröder)
  • Heinz Rasch: Design for a Hanging House, undated (circa end 1950s). Pencil on tracing paper. (Image © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 17 / 23  Heinz Rasch: Design for a Hanging House, undated (circa end 1950s). Pencil on tracing paper. (Image © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • Heinz Rasch: Design for a Suspended House, undated (circa end 1950s). Pencil, coloured pencil on blueprint on paper. (© Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main) 18 / 23  Heinz Rasch: Design for a Suspended House, undated (circa end 1950s). Pencil, coloured pencil on blueprint on paper. (© Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)
  • Bodo Rasch: Pneumatic sculptures, 1976. Pencil, marker, tip pen and coloured pencil on paper on cardboard. (Photo: Hans Schröder) 19 / 23  Bodo Rasch: Pneumatic sculptures, 1976. Pencil, marker, tip pen and coloured pencil on paper on cardboard. (Photo: Hans Schröder)
  • Brothers Rasch: 3138 armchair, 1931. Chrome-plated tubular steel, beechwood, canework, stained dark brown. Made by L&C Arnold, Stendal. Originally designed by Heinz Rasch, this version was revised by Gustav Hassenpflug in 1934/35. 20 / 23  Brothers Rasch: 3138 armchair, 1931. Chrome-plated tubular steel, beechwood, canework, stained dark brown. Made by L&C Arnold, Stendal. Originally designed by Heinz Rasch, this version was revised by Gustav Hassenpflug in 1934/35.
  • Exhibition view with the “evolution” of the tubular chair. Front row from the left sees models by Marcel Breuer, Mart Stam, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Jean Prouvé and Heinz Rasch. (Photo: Hans Schröder © MARTa Herford) 21 / 23  Exhibition view with the “evolution” of the tubular chair. Front row from the left sees models by Marcel Breuer, Mart Stam, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Jean Prouvé and Heinz Rasch. (Photo: Hans Schröder © MARTa Herford)
  • Exhibition view with the “Sitzgeiststuhl” (1927) by Heinz Rasch. (Photo: Hans Schröder © MARTa Herford) 22 / 23  Exhibition view with the “Sitzgeiststuhl” (1927) by Heinz Rasch. (Photo: Hans Schröder © MARTa Herford)
  • Exhibition view with a model of a 10-storey suspended hanging house by Heinz Rasch, 1957. (Photo: Hans Schröder © MARTa Herford) 23 / 23  Exhibition view with a model of a 10-storey suspended hanging house by Heinz Rasch, 1957. (Photo: Hans Schröder © MARTa Herford)

They might be the most significant modern masters in architecture that you have never heard of: with a current exhibition and comprehensive catalogue at MARTa Herford exploring their work, the brothers Rasch are ripe for rehabilitation into the modernist canon. And whatever the true influence of their ideas on others, two things are for certain – they produced some extraordinarily visionary drawings and had a genius for falling out with people.

If you are interested in twentieth century architecture but have never heard of the German modernist architects Bodo and Heinz Rasch, there’s no reason to feel embarrassed. For despite their profusion of radical designs for high-rises, schools, theatres, stadia, houses and even entire towns – their work has remained largely unknown. Which is, as the current exhibition The Unfettered Gaze at the MARTa museum in Herford (Germany) proves, rather a large blind spot in the history of modern architecture.

Brothers Heinz (1902-1996) and Bodo (1903-1995) Rasch only worked together for a short period of around four years. Elder brother Heinz, having set up his office while still studying at Stuttgart’s Technical University, was joined by Bodo in 1926, and until 1930 they would share a joint apartment and studio together, living and working almost in each others’ pockets. It was a remarkably productive period, and being excited about the radical new currents in art and architecture around them, the Rasch brothers enthusiastically picked up on the idea that all areas of design are interrelated: from architecture, urban planning and product design, to graphics, fashion, furniture and advertising.

While they were kept busy in their office mostly designing fair stands, exhibitions and shop displays, the Raschs also published five books on fundamental questions of design. The exhibition title refers to their 1930 publication Der gefesselte Blick (“The Fettered Gaze”) focused on the “new advertisement art”, but previous books had included Wie Bauen? (“How to Build?”, 1928), Der Stuhl (“The Chair”, 1928) and Zu-Offen (“Closed/Open”, 1930), with each a mixture of manifesto and analysis, typical of their time, seemingly inspired both by Le Corbusier’s publishing strategy and the contemporary revolutionary manifestos of the Bauhaus.

Brothers Rasch: Suspended Housing Units, perspective sketch, 1927/1928. Pencil on parchment paper. (Gift of Jo Carole and Ronald S. Lauder and the Architecture & Design Purchase Fund © Museum of Modern Art New York)

Their “studio-laboratory” quickly grew into Stuttgart’s hotspot for any visiting modernists to the city. From Heinz Rasch’s letters we learn that the brothers were not only friends with artists like Oskar Schlemmer, Kurt Schwitters and Otto Dix, but also in contact with architects like Walter Gropius, Erich Mendelsohn, Bruno Taut, Mart Stam and Mies van der Rohe, the latter being a “splendid person and pleasant guest”, as Heinz wrote to his fiancé Jutta Kochanowski in 1927. “He felt very comfortable here and also wrote to thank us for the time.”

Being so closely connected to many of the most important protagonists of different modern art movements, the Raschs experimented with light-weight, pneumatic and suspended construction techniques for furniture and for buildings. Yet their experiments for the most part remained on the drawing board. However they were invited to design the interiors of three apartments at Stuttgart’s Weißenhofsiedlung (supervised by Mies van der Rohe and completed in 1927), which could have been their big break, but typically for them the opportunity went pear-shaped. Apparently Mies van der Rohe didn’t like the plywood furniture they constructed for their “Apartment for a Batchelor” – perhaps because Mies was himself doing similar plywood furniture at that time, or perhaps because the details of the Raschs’ furniture were indeed a bit clottish.

The Brothers Rasch: “Apartment for a Bachelor” in the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe House, Weissenhof Estate, Stuttgart, 1927. (© Archiv Marzona)

Later, when Mies patented his famous cantilevered chair, Heinz wanted him to admit that the design was based on the Raschs own cantilevered chair design – which Mies refused to do. Indeed the Rasch brothers seem to have had a genius for gradually falling out with their peers. For in the years following, trying to protect many of their drawings and ideas as their own copyright, they also argued with Buckminster Fuller over the original inspiration behind the suspended construction of his famous “Dymaxion House”.

Finally, their attempts to get the recognition that they thought they deserved, imploded, with both brothers arguing with each other over the copyrights and attributions of their joint work. Add to this the global economic turndown after the 1929 Wall Street Crash and the fact that reportedly the brothers both fell in love with the same woman, the partnership of Heinz and Bodo Rasch ended in 1930 under a pretty heavy cloud. They dreamt of entire cities with suspended housing units, yet in the end the Haus Ernst Rasch in Bad Oeynhausen (1927) and the Haus mit auswechselbaren Wänden (“House with removable walls”) in Stuttgart (1930) were their only realised buildings.

House on the Hill, 1927. Ink, pencil on tracing paper. (Attributed to Heinz Rasch © Deutsches Architekturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main)

While the exhibition in Herford claims that the legacy of their ideas continues until today – showing works like Kengo Kuma’s inflatable tea pavilion, Frei Otto’s hanging roofs for the Olympic Games in Munich and Karl Schwanzer’s suspended tower for BMW in Munich to back this up – it still remains pretty unclear how big the influence of the Brothers Rasch really was. Though bursting with huge creativity and enthusiasm, they were largely unable to get any of their radically modern design ideas – even those totally their own! – out there, let alone built. It is exactly this question mark hanging over the significance of their work that makes both the exhibition and its comprehensive catalogue – in particular their extraordinary drawings – so well worth exploring.

– Florian Heilmeyer

The Unfettered Gaze. The Rasch Brothers and their Influence on Modern Architecture
Until 1 February 2015 / FINAL 2 WEEKS!
MARTa Herford
Goebenstrasse 4-10
32052 Herford
Germany

 

RECENT POSTS

more

Recent Magazines

25 Apr 2016

Magazine No. 43
Athens

  • essay

    From the Bottom and the Top

    Powering Athens through collectivity and informal initiatives by Cristina Ampatzidou

  • photo essay

    Nowhere Now Here

    A photo essay by Yiorgis Yerolymbos

  • Essay

    Back to the Garden

    Athens and opportunities for new urban strategies by Aristide Antonas

  • Interview

    Point Supreme

    An interview by Ellie Stathaki

>

03 Mar 2016

Magazine No. 42
Walk the Line

  • Essay

    The Line Connects

    An essay on drawing and architectural education by Wes Jones

  • Essay

    Drawing Attention

    Phineas Harper sketches out new narrative paths with pencil power

  • Essay

    Gotham

    Elvia Wilk on a city of shadows as architectural fiction

  • Interview

    The (Not So) Fine Line

    A conversation thread between Sophie Lovell and architecture cartoonist Klaus

>

28 Jan 2016

Magazine No. 41
Zvi Hecker

  • essay

    Space Packers

    Zvi Hecker’s career-defining partnership with Eldar Sharon and Alfred Neumann by Rafi Segal

  • Interview

    Essentially I am a Medieval Architect

    An interview with Zvi Hecker by Vladimir Belogolovsky

  • viewpoint

    The Technion Affair

    Breaking and entering in the name of architectural integrity by Zvi Hecker

  • Photo Essay

    Revisiting Yesterday’s Future

    A photo essay by Gili Merin

>

17 Dec 2015

Magazine No. 40
Iceland

  • Viewpoint

    Wish You Were Here

    Arna Mathiesen asks: Refinancing Iceland with tourism – but at what cost?

  • Photo Essay

    Spaces Create Bodies, Bodies Create Space

    An essay by Ólafur Elíasson

  • Focus

    Icelandic Domestic

    Focus on post-independence houses by George Kafka

  • Essay

    The Harp That Sang

    The saga of Reykjavík's Concert Hall by Sophie Lovell & Fiona Shipwright

>

more

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MAILING LIST Close

Uncube is brandnew and wants to look good.
For best performance please update your browser.
Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer 10 (or higher), Safari, Chrome, Opera

×